Annual Audit Manual
COPYRIGHT NOTICE — This document is intended for internal use. It cannot be distributed to or reproduced by third parties without prior written permission from the Copyright Coordinator for the Office of the Auditor General of Canada. This includes email, fax, mail and hand delivery, or use of any other method of distribution or reproduction. CPA Canada Handbook sections and excerpts are reproduced herein for your non-commercial use with the permission of The Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (“CPA Canada”). These may not be modified, copied or distributed in any form as this would infringe CPA Canada’s copyright. Reproduced, with permission, from the CPA Canada Handbook, The Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada, Toronto, Canada.
2343 Communicating results at completion to group engagement team
Oct-2012
Overview
This section discusses:
- Required and optional communication by the component auditor to the group engagement team at the conclusion of the audit
- Management representation considerations
CAS Requirement
The group engagement team shall request the component auditor to communicate matters relevant to the group engagement team's conclusion with regard to the group audit. Such communication shall include (CAS 600.41):
(a) Whether the component auditor has complied with ethical requirements that are relevant to the group audit, including independence (OAG Audit 2328) and professional competence (OAG Audit 2329).
(b) Whether the component auditor has complied with the group engagement team's requirements (OAG Audit 2341).
(c) Identification of the financial information of the component on which the component auditor is reporting.
(d) Information on instances of non-compliance with laws or regulations, including authorities, that could give rise to a material misstatement of the group financial statements.
(e) A list of uncorrected misstatements of the financial information of the component (the list need not include misstatements that are below the threshold for clearly trivial misstatements communicated by the group engagement team (see paragraph 40(c))).
(f) Indicators of possible management bias.
(g) Description of any identified significant deficiencies in internal control at the component level.
(h) Other significant matters that the component auditor communicated or expects to communicate to those charged with governance of the component, including fraud or suspected fraud involving component management, employees who have significant roles in internal control at the component level or others where the fraud resulted in a material misstatement of the financial information of the component (OAG Audit 2342).
(i) Any other matters that may be relevant to the group audit, or that the component auditor wishes to draw to the attention of the group engagement team, including exceptions noted in the written representations that the component auditor requested from component management (OAG Audit 2342).
(j) The component auditor's overall findings, conclusions or opinion (OAG Audit 2345).
CAS Guidance
The component auditor's communication with the group engagement team often takes the form of a memorandum or report of work performed. Communication between the group engagement team and the component auditor, however, may not necessarily be in writing. For example, the group engagement team may visit the component auditor to discuss identified significant risks or review relevant parts of the component auditor's audit documentation. Nevertheless, the documentation requirements of this and other CASs apply (CAS 600.A58).
Where a member of the group engagement team is also a component auditor, the objective for the group engagement team to communicate clearly with the component auditor can often be achieved by means other than specific written communication. For example a review of the component auditor's audit documentation by the group engagement team may be sufficient to communicate matters relevant to the group engagement team's conclusion set out in paragraph 41 (CAS 600.A60(b)).
OAG Guidance
Other matters to be reported by the component auditor to the group engagement team are:
- description of significant risks identified at the component that may affect the group financial statements and a summary of the component auditor's responses to those risks and the results thereof (OAG Audit 2331);
- a list of significant fraud risk factors, the auditor's response and the results of the auditor's related procedures applied (OAG Audit 5502);
- proposed adjustments booked by management, with comments of component management on uncorrected and corrected misstatements of the financial information of the component (OAG Audit 9010); and
- report on significant and other matters reported in accordance with CAS 600.41 (h) and (i) (including summary of uncorrected misstatements, significant accounting, financial reporting, auditing or taxation matters) need to include the action taken and basis for conclusion reached; any additional evidence obtained; results of consultations with others; and information identified that is inconsistent with or contradicts the component auditor's final conclusion concerning the matter (OAG Audit 1141).
Note: a list of significant matters alone is not sufficient to fulfill this requirement, as the group engagement partner must be able to understand the matter, the audit work performed, the evidence obtained and the conclusions reached.
Matters such as the following may also be communicated to the extent relevant:
- Matters that have caused a significant change in the scope of the audit.
- Specific representations for inclusion in the group letter of representation.
- Matters relating to the going concern status of the component.
- Matters relating to litigation and claims.
- Matters relating to other regulatory requirements e.g., compliance with authorities audit procedures results.
- Coordination with internal auditors.
- Reports issued by component auditor e.g., internal control memorandum, statutory audit report etc.
- Communication with those charged with governance of the component, or matters to be communicated with those charged with governance of the group (OAG Audit 2344).
- Any findings affecting the consolidating or combining of accounts in the consolidated financial statements, including matters such as:
- Those relating to accounting policies, especially changes from the prior year.
- Failure of the financial statements to meet disclosure requirements applicable to the audit areas.
- Sufficient information to enable the group engagement team to agree or to reconcile the financial statement amounts audited by the component auditor to the information underlying the consolidated financial statements.
- Letters of representation from management, and any specific representation for inclusion in the group representation letter.
The group engagement team needs to obtain, and review and retain, such documents prior to the date of the group audit report.
An Interoffice Letter of Instruction template, which includes a Memorandum of Work Performed, incorporating the required and other suggested topics to be communicated by the component auditor is included on the INTRAnet.
The component auditor communicates to the group engagement team in accordance with the reporting protocols determined at the commencement of the audit. Component auditors need to make component management aware of the reporting procedures established for communicating findings.
OAG Guidance
Specific representations for inclusion in the group letter of representation
It is the responsibility of the group engagement team to obtain group management's representation in respect of the group audit. However, if a component auditor requires representations from group management on a specific matter, it is the responsibility of the component auditor to so advise the group engagement team.
Component auditors would ordinarily communicate their requirements for specific representations in their Memorandum of Work Performed. However, the nature of matters requiring specific representations may be such that they could have a material impact on the group financial statements. Communication between the component auditor and the group engagement team is therefore essential in ensuring that potentially unusual or troublesome circumstances are communicated as soon as it is practicable.
Component management representations
Apart from communicating specific matters to be included in the group representation letter, component auditors may need to obtain representations from component management.
Where the component auditor issues a separate audit report on the audit of the component's financial statements (e.g., for statutory audit purposes), written representations are to be obtained from component management in accordance with CAS 580 (OAG Audit 9050).
Where no separate audit report (e.g., for statutory audit purposes) is issued, the need for and nature of representations from component management will depend on such matters as the nature of work performed, the structure of the group, and instructions from the group engagement team.
For instance, if the component auditor performs specified procedures or an audit of one or more account balances only, it would normally not be necessary to request the component management to provide all the representations required by CAS 580.
On the other hand, if the component auditor performs an audit of the component's financial statements or special purpose financial information such as standard reporting forms, the component auditor needs to be satisfied that appropriate representations have been obtained (our audit report asserts we have conducted the audit in accordance with CASs or other relevant auditing standards). Such representations would ordinarily be obtained from component management, but there may be circumstances where they could be obtained from management at a different level within the group (e.g., regional or functional management).
Discussions between the group and component auditors will often be helpful in determining the appropriate source of management representation. If no management representations have been obtained, the Memorandum of Work Performed should be appropriately modified to reflect this restriction in scope.
Where a statutory report is issued we need to consider how the timing of issuance of our Memorandum of Work Performed will influence the above guidance. Either the representations obtained for statutory purposes will satisfy in a timely way the requirement for suitable representation to support our overall findings, conclusions, or opinion in our Memorandum of Work Performed, or appropriate representation will first be needed as above to support our overall findings, conclusions, or opinion, to be updated or supplemented as necessary if a statutory report is subsequently issued. Representations would ordinarily be obtained close to the time that our Memorandum of Work Performed is issued, to avoid the risk that they become out of date.