Practice Reviews of Direct Engagements completed in the 2020–21 Fiscal Year

On-time reporting as of 21 February 2022

(includes results for 6 of the 6 files expected to be reviewed)

On‑time reportable observations

A. Engagement management

The audit team did not engage in thorough internal consultations on a significant matter. (1 file)

There was no one person identified as the engagement leader responsible for the overall engagement and its quality.  The allocation of responsibilities between the principals on the audit team did not sufficiently address all requirements for the engagement leader’s involvement, nor was the agreed allocation of responsibilities documented. (1 file)
B. Planning phase

The audit team did not develop an audit logic matrix, which would have set out the audit strategy in a logical way by showing the alignment of the various elements in the strategy and by identifying, at an early stage, any constraints to conducting the audit. (1 file)

Consultations were initiated with an internal specialist during the planning phase, but we found no documentation of the agreement between the individual seeking consultation and the party consulted. (2 files)

The audit team did not fully document the procedures of its risk‑based planning exercise to determine the scope and approach of the audit. (1  file)

Several independence forms were either not completed or were not appropriately reviewed. (1 file)

C. Examination phase The revisions to certain criteria that were established in planning were not communicated to the responsible party and the effect on the audit work and report were not documented. (1 file)
D. Reporting phase

The report was dated before all required procedures were finalized, including the preparation and review of some key engagement documentation. (3 files)

The audit team did not clearly document its conclusions against all of the audit criteria so that it could support its evaluation of the significance of any deviations and its overall conclusions on the audit objectives. (1 file)

The audit teams did not verify the accuracy and completeness of statements that referred to third parties in the report on a timely basis. (2 files)

The audit teams did not document their initial assessment of subsequent events up to the date of the report or they did not update the assessment to respond to the report tabling delayed by the COVID‑19 pandemic. (5 files)

The audit team did not document the identification and the review of the high risk paragraphs before issuing the findings summary document to the audited entity. (1 file)

Written representations were not received prior to the date of the report. (1 file)

The judgement in relation to the assignment of review responsibilities was not documented. (1 file)

E. Engagement quality review
F. Efficiencies
G. Other practices to improve

The audit file documentation was not assembled and finalized within 60 calendar days after the date of the assurance engagement report or within 60 days the date of tabling. (1 file)

The extension period for the final file assembly that was requested by the engagement leader was not related to unusual circumstances and put the integrity of the file at risk. (1 file)
H. Summary of good practices observed Good practices were observed for effective and efficient documentation. (2 files)
Last modified:
2022-03-18